What a P2P Lending Licence Covers
A P2P lending (peer-to-peer lending) platform facilitates direct loans between individual or institutional investors (lenders) and borrowers, without the intermediary role of a traditional bank. The platform earns revenue through origination fees, servicing fees, or a spread between borrowing and lending rates. P2P lending platforms range from consumer credit marketplaces to SME business loan platforms and property-backed lending portals.
Regulatory requirements for P2P lending platforms vary significantly by jurisdiction. In the EU, the European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation (ECSPR) creates a single pan-European framework covering both loan-based and investment-based crowdfunding platforms, allowing authorised platforms to operate across all 27 EU member states with a single licence. In the UK, FCA authorisation as a loan-based crowdfunding platform is required. In the US, the SEC regulates the investment side of P2P lending (notes offered to investors are securities) while state lending licences may be required for the lending side.
P2P lending platforms must address both sides of their two-sided market in their compliance programme: investor protections (risk disclosures, appropriateness assessments, investment limits for retail investors), borrower protections (fair lending, credit assessment, responsible lending policies), and operational requirements (wind-down plans, escrow arrangements, AML/KYC for both investors and borrowers).
EU Crowdfunding Regulation (ECSPR)
The European Crowdfunding Service Providers Regulation (ECSPR, EU 2020/1503) has been in force since November 2021 and applies fully since November 2023. It creates a harmonised framework for both lending-based and investment-based crowdfunding across the EU, replacing the fragmented national frameworks that previously applied.
Under ECSPR, a Crowdfunding Service Provider (CSP) can obtain a single authorisation from their home member state National Competent Authority (NCA) and passport this to all 27 EU member states. The €5 million per project per 12-month threshold is key: offers above this threshold are excluded from ECSPR and must comply with MiFID II and the Prospectus Regulation instead.
ECSPR requires: minimum own funds of €25,000 (rising to 0.25% of the loan book up to €1M); business continuity plan; wind-down plan; disclosure of key investment information sheets (KIIS) for each project; appropriateness assessment for retail investors; and a cap of €1,000 per project per year for non-sophisticated retail investors unless they complete an appropriateness assessment and are warned of risk.
P2P Lending Regulation by Jurisdiction
| Jurisdiction | Framework | Regulator | Min Capital | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EU | ECSPR — pan-EU passport | Home NCA (e.g., AFM, BaFin) | €25,000 | 3–6 months |
| UK | FCA Loan-Based Crowdfunding | FCA | £50,000 | 12–24 months |
| USA | SEC registration + state licences | SEC + state regulators | None specified | 6–18 months |
| Singapore | MAS CMS Licence (P2P lending) | MAS | SGD 250,000 | 6–12 months |
| Australia | ASIC Credit Licence | ASIC | AUD 5,000 | 4–8 months |
| UAE (ADGM) | ADGM FSRA Lending Crowdfunding | FSRA | USD 250,000 | 4–8 months |
DeFi Lending: Regulatory Status
DeFi (Decentralised Finance) lending protocols — such as Aave, Compound, and MakerDAO — operate as automated smart contract systems that enable crypto-collateralised lending without a centralised intermediary. Users deposit crypto as collateral and borrow against it, or supply assets to earn yield from borrowers. There is no traditional P2P lender-borrower matching; all positions are managed algorithmically.
From a regulatory standpoint, DeFi lending protocols exist in a grey area. They do not have a legal entity that can hold a P2P lending licence. They do not originate consumer credit. Most regulators have not yet issued formal guidance applying traditional P2P lending frameworks to fully decentralised protocols. However, this is changing rapidly.
The EU MiCA regulation (2024) explicitly excludes fully decentralised protocols from its scope but covers any person providing services based on DeFi protocols. Front-end operators, DAO governance token holders with significant influence, and any centralised entity facilitating DeFi access may face regulatory scrutiny. The SEC in the US has pursued enforcement actions against DeFi platforms on the basis that the protocols' governance tokens are unregistered securities.
Centralised P2P crypto lending (platforms like BlockFi and Celsius, now both bankrupt) operated differently — they took crypto deposits and lent to institutional borrowers, acting as a bank-like entity without banking licences. This model is now subject to SEC enforcement and state securities regulation in the US.